DII became involved in analyzing a legal suit after an initial defendant’s public settlement offer of over $700 million was rejected by the plaintiff who demanded more than $2 billion. After DII negotiating strategies were implemented, the final settlement was $200 million less than the offer originally rejected publicly!
 

The defendant lawyers anticipated a court judgment against the defendants of about $500 million and were prepared to settle out of court for about $160 million. Using strategies designed by DII, our Client settled the case for $70 million below what the defendant was expecting to pay. Had DII represented the plaintiffs, a settlement could have been forged around $250 million. This is a settlement swing of $160 million based only on DII settlement strategies!

DII assisted the defendant in a case our Client initially expected to settle for $125 million. DII identified the settlement price acceptable to the plaintiff and the key members of the plaintiff’s team that were amenable to discussions on the settlement price. By following the negotiating strategy devised by DII, the case settled for $65 million or nearly 1/2 the expected payment.
 

DII advised our Client on a patent infringement case that involved forecasting the likely outcome of both the price to be paid regarding the patent infringement and the % royalties to be paid going forward. The initial analysis indicated that neither issue would settle if our Client used its current strategy. DII’s simulations suggested alternative strategies that when implemented by our Client achieved agreement on both issues for well beyond what our Client anticipated.